Prevention and Management of Thrombo-embolism in Pelvi Acetabular Fractures
Vol 1 | Issue 1 | Jan-Apr 2016 | page: 26-28 | Vikram Kadu.
Author: Vikram Kadu.
 Department of Trauma, Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pune, India.
Address of Correspondence
Dr. Vikram Kadu
Junior Consultant, Sancheti Institute for Orthoapedics and Rehabiltiation, Shivaji nagar, Pune, India.
Email : email@example.com
Background: Major orthopaedic trauma is a high risk factor for development of thrombo-embolism. The incidence of thrombo-embolism in these patients varies from 30 to 80% and 0.5 to 2% depending on the type of injury, patient profile and diagnosis. Pelvic and acetabular fractures are rare, complex injuries associated with significant morbidity. Fixation of these injuries requires major orthopaedic surgery which is associated with substantial blood loss owing to the extensile operative approach and prolonged operating time. The patient needs to be assessed clinically on the basis of various factors such as calf tenderness, swelling, fever and tachycardia. Proper assessment of the patient clinically is of utmost importance in order to rule out any existing DVT. Immediate stabilization of the fracture either externally or internally plays a vital role in reducing the risk of TE. Anticoagulants should be started pre-operatively and should be continued post-operatively under supervision as a prophylactic measure to prevent TE. Low molecular wt heparin is proven effective for patients undergoing elective surgery and reduces the chances of thrombo-embolism. Use of vena cava filter as a prophylactic treatment can decrease the incidence of pulmonary embolism.
Keywords: Pelvi-acetabular fractures, thrombo-embolism, prophylaxis, management.
Pelvic and acetabular fractures have been identified as risk factors for deep venous thrombosis and thromboembolic complications. Most thrombi in trauma patients are proximal in location.[1,2] In pelvic-acetabular injuries, high-velocity trauma itself is an inciting factor for TE, which is aggravated by surgical manipulation and prolonged postoperative immobilisation.[2,3] Proximal veins are involved in around 50% cases. Proximal thrombi have a high propensity to propagate and cause PE, which is the most common cause of death during postoperative period. The rates of PE in patients with pelvi-acetabular injuries range from 2 to 10%, compared to an overall rate of 0.5 to 2% in trauma patients.  Injury to posterior structures is associated with more severe trauma than anterior injuries, and occurs when the limb is flexed and adducted at the time of impact, which is the same position that causes kinking of femoral vessels [5,6] An intrapelvic haematoma may compress the pelvic vasculature. Surgical treatment is often delayed and post-operative rehabilitation slow. Numerous studies suggest that deep-vein thrombosis in the pelvic venous plexus is more common after pelvic and acetabular fractures. [7,8,9] Thrombus formation in uninjured limb is due to procoagulant environment in post trauma patients, contributed by release of tissue factors, decreased Antithrombin III, release of acute phase reactants from liver and unregulated Thrombin formation.
Pathophysiology And Risk Factors For Vte
Pelvic and acetabular fractures usually result from high energy trauma, associated with injury to vascular structures and prolonged immobilization. The classical triad of Virchow can explain the pathogenesis of venous thrombosis in these patients. This triad labels the three factors that are thought to generate the thrombosis: hemodynamic changes, endothelial dysfunction and hyper-coagulability status. In these cases the deficiency of the laminar flow through the venous system can be caused by immobilization due to traumatic radicular lesions, limb fractures, stabilization, anaesthesia or pain. This situation will weaken the calf pump and contribute to vascular stasis. Vascular endothelial dysfunction may result from direct trauma or by the use of surgical techniques that may promote tissue necrosis or direct vessel damage. Pelvic fractures are profound stimuli for the activation of the coagulation cascade. Although initially, in the acute phase, the significantly injured patient may develop a hypocoagulable status, once stabilized, trauma patients are disposed to suffer a state of hypercoagulability, being the most important factor in the development of acute DVT the imbalanced activation of the clotting cascade. Tissue factor and markers of thrombin generation increase after a major trauma, while the endogenous anticoagulants (i.e., antithrombin III) show a tendency to be decreased.
Prophylactic therapy after orthopedic surgery has been shown to prevent 49–71% of DVT. [10-12] Patients with pelvic trauma are at high risk of thromboembolic complications, but effective methods of prophylaxis have still to be accepted and adopted. TE after major trauma is the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who survive the first 24 hours. The administration of LMWH (Enoxaparin; 40 mg by subcutaneous injection, once daily) within 24 hours of injury or on establishing haemo-dynamic stability is of prime importance. Colour Doppler is the mainstay in preventing TE by detecting blockadge early in a pre-operative period. The patient should be assessed using colour-flow duplex ultra-sonography of the external iliac, femoral and popliteal veins in both legs, if the transfer of the patient from the referring hospital had been delayed by seven days or more. The inferior vena caval filter should be used before operation if a proximal DVT was detected. The patient should be started on anticoagulants (abigatran, rivaroxaban,enoxaparin and apixaban) after 12 hours of surgery to prevent the development of fatal PE. Temporary external fixation followed by internal fixation for open complex fractures of the lower limbs serves as damage control [13-15] and stabilisation. [16-19] Stabilization of fracture prevents abnormal mobility at the fracture site avoiding further soft tissue damage as well as neurovascular compromise. Mobility at the fracture site may lead to dislodgement of thrombus leading to TE. Colour Doppler ultrasonography is largely insensitive in diagnosing pelvic vein thrombi, and a second diagnostic tool for evaluation of PE is needed. [20,21] The relatively low reported rates of TE could be attributed to this problem.[22,23] Ultrasonography is being used as screening tool to detect TE in pelvic and acetabular fracture patients. It is non-invasive and can be applied to patients bedside. Contrast enhanced CT can detect TE by scanning the chest, which differs from ultrasound. Contrast-enhanced CT can also be used to detect DVT , especially pelvic DVT, which is difficult to detect by ultrasound . Magnetic resonance venography (MRV) is non-invasive and has 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity. It can detect very small thrombi which may not be clinically significant. CT pulmonary angiography and indirect venography (CTVPA) are highly sensitive (97%) and specific (100%) for femoro-popliteal thrombus and can detect both PE and DVT using same contrast in the circulation. [26,27] It can also detect pelvic and vena caval thrombi, which are not detected by ultrasonography.
Patient should be started on anticoagulants 12 hrs after the surgery is performed. It helps in improved limb circulation. Patient should be mobilized within 48 hrs from surgery. Use of DVT pumps has now-a-days increased and surgeons are taking due care to use them prior and after the surgery in cases of acetabular fractures where early mobilization is not possible. The use of antifibrinolytics is still relatively new and their role is yet to be fully defined in the context of orthopaedic surgery. Major orthopaedic operations are associated with significant blood loss and provide a challenge in blood conservation. Prophylactic inferior vena cava filters (ICVFs) can be used to prevent pulmonary emboli as a common last resort. These endovascular devices do not prevent the development of a deep vein thrombus; they interrupt the flow in the inferior vena cava to prevent the most significant sequel of DVT, the life-threatening pulmonary embolus. Filters have been related as preventing PE in the existence of proven lower limb DVT in 98% of cases.
Pelvic-acetabular trauma is a significant risk factor for VTE, even in Indians. Patients who have posterior injuries or are operated on in the lateral position, or via the Kocher-Langenbeck approach have a signifiantly higher risk of VTE.
1. Montgomery KD, Geerts WH, Potter HG, Helfet DL. Thromboembolic complications in patients with pelvic trauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996;329:68–87.
2. Montgomery KD, Geerts WH, Potter HG, David L. Helfet DL. Practical management of venous thromboembolism following pelvic fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 1997;28:397–404.
3. Geerts WH, Code KI, Jay RM, Chen E, Szalai JP. A prospective study of venous thromboembolism after major trauma. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1601–6.
4. Webb LX, Rush PT, Fuller SB, Meredith JW. Greenfild fiter prophylaxis of pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing surgery for acetabular fracture. J Orthop Trauma 1992;6:139–45.
5. Bagaria V, Modi N, Panghate A, Vaidya S. Incidence and risk factors for development of venous thromboembolism in Indian patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery: results of a prospective study. Postgrad Med J 2006;964:136–9.
6. Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Bergqvist D, Lassen MR, Colwell CW. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004;126(3 Suppl):S338–400.
7. Montgomery KD, Geerts WH, Potter HG, Helfet DL. Thromboembolic complications in patients with pelvic trauma. Clin Orthop 1996;329:68-87.
8. Stannard JP, Riley RS, McClenney MD, et al. Mechanical prophylaxis against deep-vein thrombosis after pelvic and acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001;83-A:1047-51.
9. Rubel IF, Potter H, Barie P, Kloen P, Helfet DL. Magnetic resonance venography to evaluate deep venous thrombosis in patients with pelvic and acetabular trauma. J Trauma 2001;51:622.
10. The German Hip Arthroplasty Trial (GHAT) Group: Prevention of deep vein thrombosis with low molecular-weight heparin in patients undergoing total hip replacement: A randomized trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1992;111:110 –20.
11. Hull R, Raskob G, Pineo G, et al: A comparison of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin with warfarin sodium for prophylaxis against deep-vein thrombosis after hip or knee implantation. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1370 –6.
12. Dechavanne M, Ville D, Berruyer M, et al: Randomized trial of a low-molecularweight heparin (Kabi 2165) versus adjusted-dose subcutaneous standard heparin in the prophylaxis of deep-vein thrombosis after elective hip surgery. Haemostasis 1989;19:5–12
13. Nowotarski PJ, Turen CH, Brumback RJ, Scarboro JM. Conversion of external fiation to intramedullary nailing for fractures of the shaft of the femur in multiply injured patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:781–8.
14. Scalea TM, Boswell SA, Scott JD, Mitchell KA, Kramer ME, Pollak AN. External fiation as a bridge to intramedullary nailing for patients with multiple injuries and with femur fractures: damage control orthopedics. J Trauma 2000;48:613–23.
15. Scannell BP, Waldrop NE, Sasser HC, Sing RF, Bosse MJ. Skeletal traction versus external fiation in the initial temporization of femoral shaft fractures in severely injured patients. J Trauma 2010;68:633–40.
16. Levy BA, Krych AJ, Shah JP, Morgan JA, Stuart MJ. Staged protocol for initial management of the dislocated knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010;18:1630–7.
17. Ma CH, Wu CH, Yu SW, Yen CY, Tu YK. Staged external and internal less-invasive stabilisation system plating for open proximal tibial fractures. Injury 2010;41:190–6.
18. Ma CH, Yu SW, Tu YK, Yen CY, Yeh JJ, Wu CH. Staged external and internal locked plating for open distal tibial fractures. Acta Orthop 2010;81:382–6.
19. Oh JK, Hwang JH, Sahu D, Jun SH. Complication rate and pitfalls of temporary bridging external fiator in periarticular comminuted fractures. Clin Orthop Surg 2011;3:62–8.
20. Morgan SJ, Jeray KJ, Phieffer LS, Grigsby JH, Bosse MJ, Kellam JF. Attitudes of orthopaedic trauma surgeons regarding current controversies in the management of pelvic and acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2001;15:526–32.
21. Carpenter JP, Holland GA, Baum RA, Owen RS, Carpenter JT, Cope C. Magnetic resonance venography for the detection of deep venous thrombosis: comparison with contrast venography and duplex Doppler ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg 1993;18:734–41.
22. Steele N, Dodenhoff RM, Ward AJ, Morse MH. Thromboprophylaxis in pelvic and acetabular trauma surgery. The role of early treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:209–12.
23. Fishmann AJ, Greeno RA, Brooks LR, Matta JM. Prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in acetabular and pelvic fracture surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;305:133–7.
24. Kim T, Murakami T, Hori M, Kumano S, Sakon M, Nakamura H. Efficacy of multi-slice helical CT venography for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis: comparison with venous sonography. Radiat Med. 2004;22:77–81.
25. Stannard JP, Singhania AK, Lopez-Ben RR, Anderson ER, Farris RC, Volgas DA, McGwin GR Jr, Alonso JE. Deep vein thrombosis in high-energy skeletal trauma despite thromboprophylaxis. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2005;87:965–8.
26. Kearon C, Kahn SR, Agnelli G, Goldhaber S, Raskob GE, Comerota AJ, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008;133(6 Suppl):S454–545.
27. Loud PA, Katz DS, Klippenstein DL, Shah RD, Grossman ZD. Combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography in suspected thromboembolic disease: diagnostic accuracy for deep venous evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:61–5.
28. Greenfield L.J., Proctor M.C., Rodriguez J.L., Luchette F.A., Cipolle M.D., Cho J. Posttrauma thromboembolism prophylaxis. J. Trauma. 1997;42(1):100–103.
|How to Cite this article: Kadu V. Prevention And Management Of Thrombo-Embolism In Pelvi Acetabular Fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Complications Jan-April 2016; 1(1): 26-28.|